Showing posts with label contractor cuts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label contractor cuts. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for July 2, 2013


In today's news...

Washington Business Journal: A government starvation cycle? (Guest Blog)

Wall Street Journal: Aid Donors to Grade Afghan Progress on Commitments (subscription)

Government Executive: Defense Contractors and Military Personnel Can’t Fill In for Furloughed Civilians

FCW: Can DIA become the Defense Innovation Agency?

Federal Times: New law extends whistleblower protections to subcontractors

Thursday, June 27, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for June 27, 2013

In today's news...

The New York Times: Mandatory Federal Cuts Hurt Private Sector, Too

The Atlantic: Unsexy Ways to Cut Defense Spending

Washington Business Journal: DOMA decision: How will the feds implement same-sex benefits? 

Federal Times: Unions find surprise ally in fight against outsourcing: Republicans

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Feb. 12, 2013


Happy Tuesday! In today's news...

Government Executive: Thousands of Organizations Mobilize Against Sequestration 

Federal News Radio: Could cutting service contracts avert sequestration furloughs? 

Washington Business Journal: Federal IT procurement changes headed this way

NextGov: GSA seeks governmentwide mobile device management contracts

Washington Business Journal: Sequestration just one challenge for Karen Mills' successor at SBA


Thursday, February 7, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Feb. 7, 2013


In today's news...

Washington Post: 10 questions and answers during the sequestration waiting period

Washington Business Journal:  Simplifying the law to better protect whistleblowers 

Bloomberg: Automatic Defense Cuts Called ‘More Likely Than Unlikely’

Government Executive: Comptroller outlines strategy to simplify government

FCW: Small-business quotas could become even tougher to meet

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Jan. 30, 2013


In today's news...

Washington Post: Union says Congress can save money by lowering amount paid for contractor salaries 
             
FCW: OFPP seeks 'aggressive goals' for agency contractor reviews

Washington Post: Federal-union officials talk about budget battles

Government Executive: Threat of sequestration takes a toll on employee productivity

Friday, January 18, 2013

Divisive, Parochial Interests Should Not Drive Budget Decisions


The Professional Services Council today sharply criticized the American Federation of Government Employees for urging the executive branch to focus its budget reduction efforts on federal contractors because AFGE incorrectly believes contractors have been largely “spared” any impacts from the government’s fiscal challenges. 

“AFGE’s perspective is wrong on multiple levels,” PSC President and CEO Stan Soloway said in a media statement. “To start with, they ignore the thousands of contractor jobs that have already been cut, as well as the thousands more that will have to be cut in the execution of the OMB and DoD implementation guidance. Even worse, their perspective ignores entirely the best interests of the agencies and the taxpayer.”

“We cannot approach our current fiscal crisis solely on the basis of parochial interest. Every community that supports the government is already being affected, and will continue to be affected, by the government’s fiscal challenges,” Soloway continued. “That includes federal employees, contractors, grantees, state and local entities and more. None of us like it, but we all must face it. As we have repeatedly stated, rather than arbitrarily targeting one community or the other, agencies must be free to strategically determine how to meet their individual short- and long-term mission requirements in the most efficient and effective manner.”

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

NDAA Conference Report Addresses Top PSC Concerns


The conference version of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act addressed three of the Professional Services Council’s top concerns about the bill. 

Sec. 955 (formerly Senate Sec. 341): Rather than mandating civilian and contractor workforce reductions at a set ratio, as Senate Sec. 341 required, the new provision gives the Defense Department needed flexibility to develop an efficiency plan to adjust civilian and contractor staffing to meet the department’s actual needs. 

Sec. 864 (formerly Senate Sec. 842): Rather than arbitrarily set the allowable compensation cost limits contractors could be reimbursed for at the salary levels of the Vice President, as Senate Sec. 842 would have imposed, Sec. 864 smartly requires the Government Accountability Office to conduct a comprehensive study of the effects reducing compensation reimbursements would have on the department, it’s industrial base, and contractor employees. 

Sec. 832 (formerly Senate Sec. 843): Rather than grant the Defense Contract Audit Agency unlimited access to defense contractor internal audit reports and working papers, as Senate Sec. 843 provided, Sec. 832 ensures that DCAA cannot use internal audits and supporting materials for purposes other than assessing risk and evaluating the efficacy of contractor internal controls and the reliability of associated contractor business systems. The new provision also denies auditors the ability to disapprove a system based on internal audit information alone.

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

PSC Asks NDAA Conference Committee to Drop Arbitrary Cuts Provision


The Professional Services Council asked the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act conference committee to drop a Senate provision that would impose arbitrary reductions on the civilian and contractor workforces at the Defense Department, in a December 14 letter.

The provision, Section 341, directs the Defense Department to implement a plan to reduce funding for both DoD civilian and contractor personnel by at least the same percentage as the planned reduction in funding for military personnel between 2012 and 2017.

“PSC opposes the imposition of arbitrary reductions in the civilian and contractor workforces in Section 341 and believes that requiring DoD to make equal cuts across its blended workforce deprives the department of the ability to make strategic decisions about how to best meet its mission needs,” PSC President and CEO Stan Soloway said in the letter.

Under the current law, DoD is required to determine the most appropriate and cost-efficient mix of military, civilian and contractor personnel needed to perform its mission. While not perfect, the policy does allow DoD to access the skills they need, which the arbitrary cuts required by Section 341 would deny. 

“In a budget constrained environment Congress should be reinforcing DoD’s ability to make strategic decisions about its workforce needs and how best to balance its reliance on military personnel, DoD civilians, and contractors,” Soloway said. “Such flexibility is necessary as the mission needs of the department change.”

Thursday, December 6, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Dec. 6, 2012

In today's news...

Washington Post: Foes find common ground in opposing defense workforce cuts 

Government Executive: Senate backs lower contractor pay cap, break for women-owned firms 

Politico: The big business of fiscal cliff

Washington Post: White House touts $20 billion reduction in drop in contract spending for government

Government Executive: Defense not monitoring cost-cutting initiatives, report finds

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Dec. 5, 2012

In today's news...

Federal News Radio: IT reform bill would cull the CIO herd, give them more power

Federal News Radio: $5B in government recoveries on false claims cases

Government Executive: DCAA’s auditing triage continues to draw criticism

Washington Post: Senate rejects amendment to prevent specified cuts to defense contractors, civilians

FCW: Defense CEOs brace for fiscal cliff