Showing posts with label business systems rules. Show all posts
Showing posts with label business systems rules. Show all posts

Friday, October 5, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Oct. 5, 2012

Happy Friday! We're off on Monday for the federal holiday, but we're back on Tuesday with more news you can use. But first, today's news...

FCW: Industry resists government's push for low prices 

Federal Times: DoD withholds pay from contractors with faulty business systems

Washington Post: Small contractor: Sequestration calls for planning, not panic

Government Executive: Stopgap spending measure provides clarity to sequester threat

Monday, April 30, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for April 30, 2012


Happy Monday! Everyday SmartContracting brings you the news intel you may have missed regarding our industry.  In today's news...

Washington Post: As U.S. government contracts dwindle, losers protest more 

Washington Post: Contractors prepare for new rules on their business systems 

Federal News Radio: DoD faces struggles on path toward 'better buying power'

Washington Post:: House hopeful about a cybersecurity bill

Washington Post:: Women increasingly fill prominent defense industry positions

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Revised DoD Business Systems Proposal Still Falls Short

Everyone knows the first rule of business is there are risks to be taken and rewards for taking those risks. But lately, when doing business with the Defense Department and other government agencies, it’s been all risk with little reward. In the government’s appropriate zeal to protect taxpayer dollars, it has forgotten that its business relationships with contractors are two-way streets. One place this is most evident is in the Defense Department’s proposed rule governing when it’s appropriate to withhold payments from contractors because of faulty business systems.

When initially proposed in January 2010, PSC found the rule failed to fully describe the attributes of each of the six business systems that a contractor would need to comply with in order to have an “approved” system. It’s hard to follow your customer’s wishes when the customer won’t define the boundaries and standards. We also found the enforcement and penalties in that proposal were disproportionate to the deficiencies identified and the risk to the government from one or more of those deficiencies. In some cases, Defense agencies would be allowed to withhold payments in situations where government dollars were NOT at risk, and that’s a risky proposition for any business. The customers’ auditors weren’t even required to review and validate fixes and release properly earned funds in a timely manner.

While the proposal was improved significantly with the Dec. 3 revision, it still falls short in several key areas, as PSC and other industry groups spelled out in comments submitted on January 10 by the Council of Defense and Space Industry Associations.