The Professional Services Council (PSC) questioned the
National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) plan to create a new
Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), in comments submitted May 9.
Showing posts with label FFRDC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FFRDC. Show all posts
Friday, May 10, 2013
PSC Opposes NIST Proposal for New FFRDC
Labels:
cyber,
cybersecurity,
FFRDC,
NIST,
public comments
Friday, March 8, 2013
SmartContracting Daily Intel March 8, 2013
Happy Friday! In today's news...
Marketplace: The sequester vs. the jobs recovery
Washington Post: Days of sequester: The week-one round-up
Washington Business Journal: How agencies ignore opportunities to save billions
FCW: Push to reduce contractor compensation continues
Labels:
budget,
contractor compensation,
FFRDC,
fiscal cliff,
fiscal crisis,
furloughs,
sequestration,
spending,
spending cuts,
UARCs
Thursday, October 11, 2012
SmartContracting Daily Intel for Oct. 11, 2012
In today's news...
Washington Business Journal: To compete or not to compete?
FedScoop: Clapper: Sequestration ‘disastrous for intelligence’
FCW: IG chides DHS for careless acquisition practices
Labels:
acquisition process,
competition in contracting,
contractor compensation,
daily intel,
DCAA,
DCMA,
DHS,
DoD,
FFRDC,
Intelligence Community,
service contracts
Tuesday, June 5, 2012
SmartContracting Daily Intel for June 5, 2012
PSC: Strategic Reassessment of FFRDCs Needed
Related: Bloomberg Government: Contractor Group Says Taxpayers Lose as Nonprofit Centers Expand http://bit.ly/NE8xBC (subscription required)
Washington Technology: Will low-price contracting make us all losers?
Bloomberg Government: Affirmative-Action Violations by U.S. Vendors Reach 9-Year High
http://bit.ly/NE9c5V (subscription required)
Politico: Defense cuts could mean trouble at home for lawmakers
FCW: New White House cyber czar brings intell chops
FCW: Tracking the IT budget's upward curve
Labels:
budget,
cyberchief,
cybersecurity,
daily intel,
DoD,
FFRDC,
information technology,
LPTA,
white paper
Thursday, May 31, 2012
SmartContracting Daily Intel for May 30 & 31, 2012
Happy Thursday! Today, a special double edition of Daily Intel bringing you news you may have missed from yesterday and today.
NextGov: Budget and Staff Pressures are Reshaping the Federal Cybersecurity Market
Politico: Cyberthreats turn into megabucks for defense companies
Bloomberg Government: September Spending Spree Takes on New Urgency: BGOV Insight (subscription required) http://bit.ly/JTCewr
CNN: Defense official says automatic cuts will cause 'absurdities'
Bloomberg Government: Pay Pushing $1 Million at U.S.-Funded Groups Spurs Call for Caps (subscription required) http://bit.ly/MbSaz6
Labels:
budget,
cybersecurity,
daily intel,
DoD,
FFRDC,
sequestration
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
SmartContracting Daily Intel for May 1, 2012
Defense News: DoD Seeks New Commercial Buying Rules
Federal Times: News Digest: Industry group opposes new research center
FCW: Industry wants agencies in control, not mandates
New York Times: Agency Scandal Highlights Conference Contracts
Federal News Radio: FAA's low marks cast more doubt on 'NextGen': BGOV Insight
Labels:
commercial buying news,
daily intel,
FAA,
FFRDC,
GSA,
industry,
NDAA
Friday, April 13, 2012
SmartContracting Daily Intel for April 13, 2012
Happy Friday the 13th! Don't be afraid, SmartContracting is here to get you ready for the weekend with a rundown of today's news regarding our industry.
FCW: Bill would allow federally funded centers to get exclusive access to government work
Government Executive: Obama declines to issue executive order on contractor bias
OMB Blog: Do Not Pay Solution Open for Business
FedScoop: FedRAMP Providers to be Announced in May
Federal News Radio: Agencies feel strain of balancing mobility, security
Labels:
anti-discrimination,
cybersecurity,
daily intel,
executive order,
FedRAMP,
FFRDC,
GSA,
improper payments,
information technology
Monday, April 25, 2011
PSC Raises Concerns with Creation of CMS FFRDC
A key pillar of the Obama administration’s ongoing acquisition reform effort is boosting competition for opportunities to support the government’s missions. Yet, a decidedly non-competitive trend is emerging among federal agencies. Increasingly, agencies are forgoing altogether the normal procurement process to instead make sole-source awards to non-profits entities known as Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs).
The latest example comes from the Health and Human Services Department, which plans to establish a new FFRDC for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that will be available to the entire department. In an April 12 letter, PSC objected to the CMS plan outlined in a March 17 Federal Business Opportunities (FBO) notice because their proposal does not appear to meet the basic requirements for establishing such an entity.
Simply put, CMS failed to identify any research or development needs or justify why the FFRDC should be permitted to perform work across HHS. Under the Federal Acquisition Regulation, there are 10 requirements agencies must satisfy before establishing an FFRDC, including ensuring that “existing alternative sources for satisfying agency requirements cannot effectively meet the special research or development needs” of the agency. More significantly, the FAR requires that the “basic purpose and mission of the FFRDC is stated clearly enough to enable differentiation between work which should be performed by the FFRDC and that which should be performed by non-FFRDCs.”
In our view, the notice does neither. CMS takes a different view.
In an April 13 letter to PSC, CMS wrote that although CMS leaders are “aware of the specific regulations regarding the establishment of an FFRDC,” CMS “does not have a requirement of detailing our market research or decision making processes” because “revealing this information may compromise the procurement process.” How publicly justifying procurement decisions would do so is not explained, but CMS assured PSC that all the appropriate processes were followed. Given the lack of transparency into their processes, we’ll just have to take their word for it. But that won’t stop us from raising our objections to the CMS initiative.
Labels:
CMS,
competition in contracting,
FFRDC,
HHS,
transparency
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)