Showing posts with label executive compensation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label executive compensation. Show all posts

Friday, September 6, 2013

PSC Responds to Rules Expanding Executive Compensation Cap Coverage

PSC, through the Council of Defense and Space Industry Associations (CODSIA), on August 26, responded to interim and proposed FAR rules to implement the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act provision requiring the cap on executive compensation to apply to all employees performing under defense contracts.

The two sets of comments, available here and here raised concerns that the interim and proposed rules improperly applied the expansion to contracts that were forged before the law expanding coverage went into effect on December 31, 2011. Such retroactive applications would cause the government to breach all contracts established before the effective date, CODSIA said. In addition, CODSIA said that, contrary to the rules’ Regulatory Flexibility Act statements, the rules did impose a burden on contractors, particularly small businesses, to maintain more than one billing rate structure for 2012, 2013, and possibly several years into the future. Many systems are not designed or configured to process different rates for the same work, the comments said.

Tuesday, June 4, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for June 4, 2013

In today's news: 

The Hill: Defense panel rejects Obama cap on executive pay 

Defense News: US Intel Community Turning to Commercial Companies for R&D

Federal News Radio: From left, right and center, analysts beg DoD to tackle overhead costs

FCW: Five FAS employees put on leave over Crystal City event

Friday, May 31, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for May 31, 2013

Happy Friday! In today's news...

Federal Times: White House wants new caps on contractor pay 

USA Today: ANALYSIS: Why cyberwarfare is the great equalizer

Federal Times: Agencies should plan for up to 10% cut in FY15, OMB says
                Related memo: http://1.usa.gov/16vWhAj

Federal News Radio: Marine Corps prepares to cut cord on NMCI



Wednesday, December 19, 2012

NDAA Conference Report Addresses Top PSC Concerns


The conference version of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act addressed three of the Professional Services Council’s top concerns about the bill. 

Sec. 955 (formerly Senate Sec. 341): Rather than mandating civilian and contractor workforce reductions at a set ratio, as Senate Sec. 341 required, the new provision gives the Defense Department needed flexibility to develop an efficiency plan to adjust civilian and contractor staffing to meet the department’s actual needs. 

Sec. 864 (formerly Senate Sec. 842): Rather than arbitrarily set the allowable compensation cost limits contractors could be reimbursed for at the salary levels of the Vice President, as Senate Sec. 842 would have imposed, Sec. 864 smartly requires the Government Accountability Office to conduct a comprehensive study of the effects reducing compensation reimbursements would have on the department, it’s industrial base, and contractor employees. 

Sec. 832 (formerly Senate Sec. 843): Rather than grant the Defense Contract Audit Agency unlimited access to defense contractor internal audit reports and working papers, as Senate Sec. 843 provided, Sec. 832 ensures that DCAA cannot use internal audits and supporting materials for purposes other than assessing risk and evaluating the efficacy of contractor internal controls and the reliability of associated contractor business systems. The new provision also denies auditors the ability to disapprove a system based on internal audit information alone.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for August 22, 2012

In today's news...

WJLA: Executive Compensation within Federal Contractors Under Scrutiny

FCW: DHS considers rule change to protect subcontractors

Government Executive: Obama tells Defense communities sequestration should be avoided

Government Executive: Pentagon showing only modest progress toward clean books

DoDBuzz: Congressman proposes ‘green-on-blue’ HASC hearing

Federal News Radio: Derecho strikes GSA right in the cloud

Government Exec: Managing Innovation

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for April 25, 2012


Everyday SmartContracting brings you the news intel you may have missed regarding our industry and our government customers. In today's news...

Federal Times: Government to pay contractor executives more

FCW: OFPP nominee could be in for a long wait 

Federal News Radio: Performance improvement has 'turned the corner' in government 

Bloomberg Government: Losers Protest More as U.S. Contracts Dwindle: BGOV Barometer
http://bit.ly/K4cUCp (subscription required)

Federal Times: Bill would require services to share ‘wish lists' annually

Federal News Radio: Pentagon nears expansion of cyber information sharing effort

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for April 24, 2012


Everyday SmartContracting brings you the news intel you may have missed regarding our industry and our government customers. In today's news...

Government Executive: OMB raises salary cap for contractor executives because it has to 

NextGov: OMB: Veterans Affairs budget is exempt from sequestration
http://bit.ly/IeO2Yh

Washington Post: GSA probe focuses on conference contractor

Government Executive: GSA scandal lends urgency to data transparency measure

Federal News Radio: USAID's emphasizes strengthening local institutions

Washington Business Journal: Missile Defense Agency faulted for overlapping acquisition process

Washington Business Journal: Committees to focus on simplifying relationship between small business, DOD

Monday, April 23, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for April 23, 2012



Happy Monday! Everyday SmartContracting brings you the news intel you may have missed regarding our industry.  

Bloomberg Government: Pay Cap for U.S. Contractors’ Top Executives Rises to $763,000
http://bit.ly/I69vWG (Subscription Required)

Washington Post/Capital Business: Growing roots for more STEM

Washington Post/Capital Business: SBA revamps size standards for companies to receive small-biz contracts

Government Executive: No leeway on contractor campaign gifts

Washington Post/Capital Business: Company offers jobs, support for injured veterans

Washington Post/Capital Business: Contracting veterans start their own IT services firm 

Federal News Radio: Private-sector mentality to blame in GSA scandal, senator says 

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Compensation Caps: Recipes for Disaster


A version of this column appeared on the Washington Business Journal's FedBizDaily blog. You can read it here. 

By Stan Soloway, PSC President and CEO

Earlier this year, the Congressional Budget Office released a comprehensive report that confirmed what many, including the public employee unions, have long believed: there is a pay gap between the public and private sectors that becomes increasingly pronounced the higher up the skills ladder you go. CBO's study also documented that, overall, federal employee benefits are on average 48 percent higher than those received by private sector employees.

The pay gap, along with other weaknesses in the federal personnel system, is one main reason that the government has such a difficult time hiring and retaining key technology skills to support its vital missions, including cybersecurity. With the federal retirement rate rising (according to OPM the retirement pace grew by 30 percent last year), and pay and hiring freezes in effect across much of the government, the picture is truly worrisome.

Against that backdrop, both the administration and Sens. Charles Grassley and Barbara Boxer have come up with proposals that, for lack of a kinder term, are recipes for disaster. Both want to restructure the way in which caps on allowable contractor compensation are determined and limit them to either the President's salary (Grassley/Boxer) or an arbitrary amount loosely tied to federal salaries (administration). Both ideas lack substantive merit and both will only exacerbate the government's workforce and mission challenges.

Friday, March 30, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for March 30, 2012


Happy Friday! Get ready for the weekend with today's news. 

Washington Business Journal: Compensation Caps: Recipes for Disaster

Federal Times: OMB guidance expected on measuring insourcing, outsourcing costs

Washington Post: Senate panel examines contractor spending

FCW: Senator knocks government spending on contractors

Federal News Radio: OFPP readying round 2 of Mythbusters 

Washington Post: Senator proposes reforms for Senior Executive Service

Monday, March 19, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for March 19, 2012


Everyday SmartContracting brings you the news intel you may have missed regarding our industry. 

A related interview with PSC's Stan Soloway appeared on BBC Radio4's "The World This Weekend." His segment regarding the impacts of the switch to the Afghan Public Protection Force starts at the 11 minute mark.  
Washington Post/Capital Business: Government adds rule for acquisitions



Friday, October 21, 2011

The Compelling Rappelling Stories of a Government Contractor

They’re at it again. The government contractors who rappelled down the side of the Washington Monument and the National Cathedral to assess the damage from the August earthquake are now scaling the Air Force Memorial to check for cracks and corrosion.

Engineers from the “difficult access team” at engineering firm WJE (not a PSC member) are a shining example of what contracting looks like when it’s done right (which is 99 percent of the time).

These important inspections highlight why government and industry must work in partnership to do great things and why contracting can be smarter than hiring in house staff. In this case, the high cost of keeping a band of rappelling engineers on staff would be prohibitive, especially when one considers the rare and temporary need at hand. Although some who say contractor billing rates are too high would disagree, the duration of the work is an important factor in determining when to hire a contractor and when to hire an employee. It’s far more taxpayer friendly to hire a short-term contractor to do specialized work, like rappelling down the side of a national landmark, than it is to hire that person on permanently and thus making the taxpayers foot the bill for pension and lifelong health care costs, even if the short-term contractor costs are “higher.”

But such smart partnerships are in jeopardy. If Congress chooses to arbitrarily further limit the costs contractors can reimburse for salaries of their best, brightest and bravest employees, it may be impossible for companies to do work with the government, especially when it comes to high-skill or high-risk work.

Photo via nps.gov.