Showing posts with label DCAA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DCAA. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for May 21, 2013


In today's news...

Fiscal Times: Pentagon’s Failure to Audit Contracts Wastes Billions 

FedScoop: 10 tips for maximizing data-driven innovation

Federal News Radio: OMB reworking financial system requirements to focus on outcomes, not inputs

FCW: DOD business systems under fire -- again

Government Executive: The Furloughs That Never Came

Federal Times: Sequester doesn't add up for IGs


Monday, March 11, 2013

SmartContracting Daily Intel for March 11, 2013


Happy Monday. Time for the news...

FCW:DOD IG raps contract auditors

Washington Post: Federal agency pursuing broader pay discrimination analyses 

Washington Post: Protests rarely result in U.S. contract reversals, study shows 

Washington Post: Sequester punctures area economy’s government-dependent bubble

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

NDAA Conference Report Addresses Top PSC Concerns


The conference version of the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act addressed three of the Professional Services Council’s top concerns about the bill. 

Sec. 955 (formerly Senate Sec. 341): Rather than mandating civilian and contractor workforce reductions at a set ratio, as Senate Sec. 341 required, the new provision gives the Defense Department needed flexibility to develop an efficiency plan to adjust civilian and contractor staffing to meet the department’s actual needs. 

Sec. 864 (formerly Senate Sec. 842): Rather than arbitrarily set the allowable compensation cost limits contractors could be reimbursed for at the salary levels of the Vice President, as Senate Sec. 842 would have imposed, Sec. 864 smartly requires the Government Accountability Office to conduct a comprehensive study of the effects reducing compensation reimbursements would have on the department, it’s industrial base, and contractor employees. 

Sec. 832 (formerly Senate Sec. 843): Rather than grant the Defense Contract Audit Agency unlimited access to defense contractor internal audit reports and working papers, as Senate Sec. 843 provided, Sec. 832 ensures that DCAA cannot use internal audits and supporting materials for purposes other than assessing risk and evaluating the efficacy of contractor internal controls and the reliability of associated contractor business systems. The new provision also denies auditors the ability to disapprove a system based on internal audit information alone.

Thursday, October 11, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Oct. 11, 2012


In today's news...

Washington Business Journal: To compete or not to compete? 

FedScoop: Clapper: Sequestration ‘disastrous for intelligence’

FCW: IG chides DHS for careless acquisition practices

Monday, September 10, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for Sept. 10, 2012


Happy Monday!  In today's news...
Defense News: Price Wars Prompt Firms To Abandon Service Sector

Washington Post: Contractors wary as DCAA seeks more internal documents 

Washington Post: Government calls for more stringent information controls

Government Executive: Republicans rap White House silence on sequester report

Politico: Defense firms say layoff warnings loom

Federal News Radio: OMB's Zients hints at making strategic sourcing mandatory

Washington Business Journal: Sequestration's regional impact: A chain reaction

FCW: Executive order could institute controversial cybersecurity measures

Federal Times: Lost in the cloud: Agencies go elsewhere for computing needs

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for August 21, 2012



Happy Tuesday! Now for today's news...


Federal Times: Bill to hold agencies accountable for poorly performing overseas contractors

Washington Post: Surge in canceled deals offers preview of sequester damage ahead

FCW: OMB demands agencies trim IT for 2014

GovWin: Contracting 101: Complying with the DCAA Cost Accounting Standards

Defense News: DoD Plan for Rapid Cyber Buys Delayed

Monday, June 11, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for June 11, 2012


Federal Times: DoD contract audits plunge in quest for thoroughness

The Hill: Senators quietly laying groundwork for looming defense sequestration fight

FCW: OFPP freshens up time-tested cost savings technique

Government Executive: Procurement chief tells agencies to focus on small business set-asides

FCW: Senators drafting bipartisan compromise on cybersecurity legislation


Tuesday, May 29, 2012

SmartContracting Daily Intel for May 29, 2012


Happy Tuesday! In today's news...

Fox Business: Are 2013 Budget Cuts Hurting Business? 

Washington Post: The high cost of savings

Washington Post: Contractors air concerns about hiring proposal

Federal Times: DoD's contract audit agency hobbled by backlog

Wall Street Journal: Afghan Dam Saga Reflects U.S. Travails

Monday, February 14, 2011

Guest Blog: PSC on DCAA: Progress Made, More Improvements Needed

By Roger Jordan
Vice President, Government Relations

Recent coverage of the Defense Contract Audit Agency’s problems, including the recent HSGAC Contracting Oversight Subcommittee hearing on February 1, has focused on how the agency has improved its audit processes through risk-based audit strategies that prioritize high-risk contracts and related actions. In testimony and recent interviews with the media, DCAA director Patrick Fitzgerald touted that the changes he’s implemented, coupled with a new contractor business systems rule, will put the agency back on track, he believes.

Admittedly, Fitzgerald has more work to do, and from an industry perspective we encourage him to look at the effect of his reforms on contractors and what further steps must be taken to improve DCAA-industry collaboration. For example, DCAA is still not effectively communicating with industry about corrective action plans contractors implement in response to DCAA audit findings deeming contractors’ systems deficient. In addition, DCAA is taking an excruciatingly long period of time to give contractors’ systems a “clean bill of health” after corrective action plans have proven effective.

Unfortunately, the Senate hearing represented a missed opportunity to focus on these issues.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Revised DoD Business Systems Proposal Still Falls Short

Everyone knows the first rule of business is there are risks to be taken and rewards for taking those risks. But lately, when doing business with the Defense Department and other government agencies, it’s been all risk with little reward. In the government’s appropriate zeal to protect taxpayer dollars, it has forgotten that its business relationships with contractors are two-way streets. One place this is most evident is in the Defense Department’s proposed rule governing when it’s appropriate to withhold payments from contractors because of faulty business systems.

When initially proposed in January 2010, PSC found the rule failed to fully describe the attributes of each of the six business systems that a contractor would need to comply with in order to have an “approved” system. It’s hard to follow your customer’s wishes when the customer won’t define the boundaries and standards. We also found the enforcement and penalties in that proposal were disproportionate to the deficiencies identified and the risk to the government from one or more of those deficiencies. In some cases, Defense agencies would be allowed to withhold payments in situations where government dollars were NOT at risk, and that’s a risky proposition for any business. The customers’ auditors weren’t even required to review and validate fixes and release properly earned funds in a timely manner.

While the proposal was improved significantly with the Dec. 3 revision, it still falls short in several key areas, as PSC and other industry groups spelled out in comments submitted on January 10 by the Council of Defense and Space Industry Associations.