In the debate over sourcing federal work, there is one point where all sides agree: the government does a poor job of estimating its own costs when comparing them to private-sector costs of performance.
Now, just in time to inform this debate, which is again surfacing as Congress considers the National Defense Authorization Act, the Center for Strategic and International Studies released an important report identifying enormous gaps in current cost-comparison methodologies. Moreover, the CSIS report proposes a new taxonomy for making these comparisons that is more comprehensive and source-neutral than any method available to the government today.