Tuesday, May 25, 2010

When it comes to insourcing, greater analysis is needed to avoid mission paralysis


Federal agencies, quite rightly, are determining where they may have gone overboard with outsourcing by contracting out work that should have been kept in-house to maintain government control over its mission. Where agencies find they’ve improperly outsourced jobs, they’re supposed to insource only the positions that will put the government back in the driver’s seat of mission control.

But so far, the government’s execution of insourcing has been a non-strategic, quota-driven exercise, which actually threatens the government’s ability to carry out its mission in an efficient and cost-effective manner, PSC Executive Vice President and Counsel Alan Chvotkin warned the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

“Insourcing for the sake of insourcing is no more intelligent, no more effective, and no more defensible than outsourcing for the sake of outsourcing. Nor should government accept repeating the mistakes of past outsourcing efforts when implementing insourcing efforts,” Chvotkin said at a May 20 hearing of the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia.

It’s IT Procurement Reform…and PSC Helped!

The Senate took a step toward smart information technology contracting on May 19, passing S. 920, the “Information Technology Investment Oversight Enhancement and Waste Prevention Act of 2009.” The bipartisan bill, which PSC helped the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee craft, would improve agency and congressional processes to track the performance, cost and schedule of IT projects and prevent the requirements creep that often lead complex IT procurements into failure. The legislation, which was sponsored by Sens. Tom Coburn, D-Del. and Susan Collins, R-Maine, would also create an “IT SWAT Team” of government, industry and non-profit IT experts to provide skilled support to agencies managing complex IT projects. The SWAT Team would support government project managers from system development to execution to ensure it is successfully deployed. The bill now heads to the House for approval, as it travels on the School House Rock described path to becoming law.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Government contracts abroad spur jobs at home, save taxpayer dollars

What do government contracts for work removing landmines in former combat zones, protecting embassies globally and outfitting forward operating bases in Iraq and Afghanistan mean at home?

To the Tennessee towns of Lenoir City and Maryville, the more than $80 million in combined contracts two rival companies — EOD Technology of Lenoir City and Relyant of Maryville — hold with the government have created nearly 200 local jobs and generated substantial tax revenue.

To the troops in the combat zone, they have provided information technology and logistics support, as well as money-saving, climate-controlled for housing that allows for investment in other equipment.

To embassy staff around they world, they’ve provided safety through compound security contracts.

And to the communities they work in abroad, they provide roads and fields free of explosive devices and free of hazardous waste due to contracts for munitions and waste cleanup.

You can read more about the local and global impacts these firms have had in the Knoxville (Tenn.) News Sentinel.

While you read, keep in mind these are two firms with a small slice of the $500 billion government contracting pie. Given the successes of these firms, imagine what the entire government contracting community brings at home and abroad!

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Shah’s Vision Offers Opportunities…and Pitfalls

U.S. Agency for International Development Administrator Rajiv Shah praised for-profit and non-profit development firms for their work at a town-hall meeting the Global Leadership Coalition sponsored in yesterday in Washington, D.C. That was right before he told those gathered he plans to insource much of the program design, monitoring and evaluation work many contractors have diligently completed for USAID for decades.

“Our current contracting systems exist for a reason. They enable our employees to get work done in an environment where they don’t always have the internal resources to do that work. And we depend greatly on many of our partners in this room to get that work done and to be a part of that system,” Shah said. “We have to insource program design, monitoring and evaluation. We simply can’t write contracts anymore that include and outsource all of that in a singular effort.”

PSC responded to Shah’s comments today with a letter urging him to keep industry in the loop during his strategic human capital planning. In the letter PSC President and CEO Stan Soloway also urged Shah to keep that strategic planning strategic.

Smart Contracting leads to Freedom from FAFSA Fear

The Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) is a government form with a reputation for striking fear in the heart of every college student on an annual basis. Students and their parents know – or soon find out – that a student’s entire aid package (even the non-federal aid offered by educational institutions) hinges on how they answer the 107 questions required by the Education Department. And one mistake could cost more than a student loan.

So it’s no wonder that the Education Department’s Office of Federal Student Aid was one of the three winners in the Third Annual Citizen Services Awards for an online support tool to assist FAFSA applicants with their submissions in real time. The tool was implemented by Vangent, Inc. of Arlington, a Professional Services Council member and, as the award attests, one smart contractor.

PSC Supports Woman-Owned Small Business Rule

The Professional Services Council this week submitted comments to the Small Business Administration highlighting some necessary recommendations to strengthen its proposed Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Federal Contract Program.

While PSC generally supports the long-awaited program, which was first mandated by Congress in 2000, we believe the following will help SBA achieve the programs goals:

  • Provide a level playing field for both economically disadvantaged WOSBs and other WOSBs to compete for set-aside contracts under the program.
  • Swift action to identify third-party certifiers for WOSB status so businesses can readily take advantage of the program.
  • Quickly establish a program repository that allows businesses to submit documents online regarding their eligibility for the program to avoid having to provide eligibility documents each time they submit a proposal for a set-aside solicitation.
  • Set a clear timeline for when and how often the industry codes eligible for the set-aside program will be reviewed and updated. In addition, SBA should consider a petition process for organizations to provide information to SBA about market changes that may justify including new NAICS codes.

To read PSC’s comments, click here.

Monday, May 3, 2010

PSC to Gates: DoD’s Strategic Human Capital Initiative is Devolving into a Quota-Driven Process

Professional Services Council President and CEO Stan Soloway sent a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates today expressing concern that the Defense Department’s plan to insource critical functions is going off track. The president of the International Association of Machinists, R. Thomas Buffenbarger, sent a separate letter to the secretary with identical concerns. Read our press release and both letters here.

PSC Raises Concerns with DoD’s Safeguarding Unclassified Information Rule

The Professional Services Council today submitted comments that raise concerns to the Defense Department regarding an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking to govern how contractors protect controlled unclassified DoD information residing on contractor networks.

While PSC believes protecting this information is important to both national security and industry interests, the notice raised several concerns. Among PSC’s concerns are the broad scope of its application, its lack of clarity of a number of key terms and its potentially onerous reporting requirements.