Federal agencies, quite rightly, are determining where they may have gone overboard with outsourcing by contracting out work that should have been kept in-house to maintain government control over its mission. Where agencies find they’ve improperly outsourced jobs, they’re supposed to insource only the positions that will put the government back in the driver’s seat of mission control.
But so far, the government’s execution of insourcing has been a non-strategic, quota-driven exercise, which actually threatens the government’s ability to carry out its mission in an efficient and cost-effective manner, PSC Executive Vice President and Counsel Alan Chvotkin warned the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.
“Insourcing for the sake of insourcing is no more intelligent, no more effective, and no more defensible than outsourcing for the sake of outsourcing. Nor should government accept repeating the mistakes of past outsourcing efforts when implementing insourcing efforts,” Chvotkin said at a May 20 hearing of the Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia.